Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 13; no. 6; pp. 615 - 617
• Main Authors: UNDERWOOD, R. A, WEINSTOCK, L. B, SOPER, N. J, QUASEBARTH, M. A, BRUNT, L. M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Springer 01.06.1999
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological and medical sciences; Deglutition Disorders - etiology; Deglutition Disorders - surgery; Esophagus; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux - prevention & control; Humans; Laparoscopy; Medical sciences; Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the digestive system; Human; Gastroesophageal reflux; Prosthesis; Esophageal disease; Instrumentation therapy; Taking down; Laparoscopy; Case study; Treatment; Elastic ring; Digestive diseases; Female; Endoscopy
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s004649901053

The use of Angelchik prosthetic rings for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has been associated with frequent complications, including dysphagia and migration, erosion, or disruption of the ring. Although reports of the laparoscopic insertion of Angelchik rings have been published, there have been no descriptions of the laparoscopic removal of rings inserted at open laparotomy. Our group recently removed an Angelchik ring laparoscopically in an 80-year-old woman with progressive, refractory dysphagia and esophageal narrowing due to an Angelchik ring originally placed in 1981 via an upper midline incision at open operation. Upper endoscopy and dilatation had failed to provide symptom relief. An extensive adhesiolysis was performed laparoscopically, and the Angelchik ring was dissected free from the proximal stomach, diaphragm, and liver. The fibrous pseudocapsule enclosing the ring was divided, and the prosthesis was removed from around the esophagus and abdominal cavity. Intraoperative upper endoscopy confirmed resolution of the esophageal stricture. There were no intraoperative complications, and the patient was discharged home on the 3rd postoperative day tolerating a regular diet. Postoperatively, she experienced resolution of her dysphagia and complained only of mild reflux symptoms, which were easily controlled with famotidine and antireflux precautions. This case suggests that laparoscopic removal of Angelchik prosthetic rings is feasible for surgeons familiar with advanced laparoscopic procedures of the esophageal hiatus and should be considered for symptomatic patients, even if the ring was inserted via an open operation.