Utilization of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Vol. 60; no. 7; p. 1084
• Main Authors: Lin, Chi-Bo, Chuang, Shu-Han, Shih, Hung-Jen, Pan, Yueh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 02.07.2024
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Cohort analysis; Hospitalization; Kidney stones; Libraries; Meta-analysis; Patients; Performance evaluation; retrograde intrarenal surgery; Sensitivity analysis; Statistical analysis; stone-free rate; ureteral access sheath; Urology; meta-analysis; ureteral access sheath; retrograde intrarenal surgery; stone-free rate
• ISSN: 1648-9144; 1010-660X; 1648-9144
• DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071084

: This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of ureteral access sheath (UAS) utilization in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). : We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 30 August 2023. The inclusion criteria comprised English-language original studies on RIRS with or without UAS in humans. The primary outcome was SFR, while the secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, the lengths of the operation and the hospitalization period, and the duration of the fluoroscopy. Subgroup analyses and a sensitivity analysis were performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's regression tests. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while mean differences (MDs) were employed for continuous variables. : We included 22 studies in our analysis. These spanned 2001 to 2023, involving 12,993 patients and 13,293 procedures. No significant difference in SFR was observed between the UAS and non-UAS groups (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.63-1.30, = 0.59). Intraoperative (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.75-1.69, = 0.5) and postoperative complications (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.89-1.87, = 0.18) did not significantly differ between the groups. UAS usage increased operation times (MD = 8.30, 95% CI 2.51-14.10, = 0.005) and fluoroscopy times (MD = 5.73, 95% CI 4.55-6.90, < 0.001). No publication bias was detected for any outcome. : In RIRS, UAS usage did not significantly affect SFR, complications, or hospitalization time. However, it increased operation time and fluoroscopy time. Routine UAS usage is not supported, and decisions should be patient-specific. Further studies with larger sample sizes and standardized assessments are needed to refine UAS utilization in RIRS.