Survey on testing criteria and reporting methods for human immunodeficiency virus serologic tests in Veterans Administration Medical Centers

• Published in: Infection control : IC Vol. 8; no. 10; p. 407
• Main Authors: Mottice, S, Matsumiya, S, Reimer, L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.10.1987
• Subjects: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - immunology; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - prevention & control; Antibodies, Viral - analysis; Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence; Consent Forms; Disclosure; HIV - immunology; HIV Antibodies; Hospitals, Veterans; Humans; Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence; Medical Records, Problem-Oriented; Occupational Diseases - prevention & control; Personnel, Hospital; Risk Factors; Empirical Approach; Veterans Administration Medical Centers; Health Care and Public Health
• ISSN: 0195-9417
• DOI: 10.1017/S0195941700066571

Guidelines for the indications for use, requirements for consent, and mechanisms for reporting of serologic tests for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are not standardized. In trying to establish such guidelines for our hospital, we surveyed all Veterans Administration Medical Centers regarding their current approach to testing both patients and employees. Infection control practitioners from 67 hospitals representing 37 states responded. Patients are likely to be tested for diverse reasons, unlikely to be counseled about the test or be required to consent to it, and test results are given no special precautions. Although 66% of the respondents do not use any extra precautions concerning patient confidentiality, 80% utilize more stringent criteria for testing and result-reporting with employees than patients. Thus, while the majority of hospitals maintain that current modes of confidentiality are acceptable for patients, practice suggests that these modes are considered inadequate for employees.