Canadian health care providers' and education workers' hesitance to receive original and bivalent COVID-19 vaccines

Background: The demand for COVID-19 vaccines has diminished as the pandemic lingers. Understanding vaccine hesitancy among essential workers is important in reducing the impact of future pandemics by providing effective immunization programs delivered expeditiously. Method: Two surveys exploring COV...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVaccine Vol. 42; no. 24; p. 126271
Main Authors Coleman, Brenda L., Gutmanis, Iris, Bondy, Susan J., Harrison, Robyn, Langley, Joanne, Fischer, Kailey, Cooper, Curtis, Valiquette, Louis, Muller, Matthew P., Powis, Jeff, Bowdish, Dawn, Katz, Kevin, Loeb, Mark, Smieja, Marek, McNeil, Shelly A., Mubareka, Samira, Nadarajah, Jeya, Arnoldo, Saranya, McGeer, Allison
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 24.10.2024
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The demand for COVID-19 vaccines has diminished as the pandemic lingers. Understanding vaccine hesitancy among essential workers is important in reducing the impact of future pandemics by providing effective immunization programs delivered expeditiously. Method: Two surveys exploring COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in 2021 and 2022 were conducted in cohorts of health care providers (HCP) and education workers participating in prospective studies of COVID-19 illnesses and vaccine uptake. Demographic factors and opinions about vaccines (monovalent and bivalent) and public health measures were collected in these self-reported surveys. Modified multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine factors associated with hesitancy. Results: In 2021, 3 % of 2061 HCP and 6 % of 3417 education workers reported hesitancy (p < 0.001). In December 2022, 21 % of 868 HCP and 24 % of 1457 education workers reported being hesitant to receive a bivalent vaccine (p = 0.09). Hesitance to be vaccinated with the monovalent vaccines was associated with earlier date of survey completion, later receipt of first COVID-19 vaccine dose, no influenza vaccination, and less worry about becoming ill with COVID-19. Factors associated with hesitance to be vaccinated with a bivalent vaccine that were common to both cohorts were receipt of two or fewer previous COVID-19 doses and lower certainty that the vaccines were safe and effective. Conclusion: Education workers were somewhat more likely than HCP to report being hesitant to receive COVID-19 vaccines but reasons for hesitancy were similar. Hesitancy was associated with non-receipt of previous vaccines (i.e., previous behaviour), less concern about being infected with SARS-CoV-2, and concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for both cohorts. Maintaining inter-pandemic trust in vaccines, ensuring rapid data generation during pandemics regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, and effective and transparent communication about these data are all needed to support pandemic vaccination programs. •3 % of health care providers and 6 % of education workers reported hesitancy about receiving their first COVID-19 vaccines.•21 % of health care providers and 24 % of education workers were hesitant about receiving a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine.•Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were similar for health care and education workers and for monovalent and bivalent vaccines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126271