Internal History of Philosophy
I defend an internal history of philosophy that prioritizes philosophical reasons over other cultural factors. This approach contrasts with a broadly contextualist endeavour, which invokes cultural factors without clear ground. I argue that the latter path is either too permissive or it leads to aim...
Saved in:
Published in | Filozofia (Bratislava) Vol. 78; no. 10; pp. 848 - 864 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Institute of Philosophy SAS, v.v.i
01.01.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | I defend an internal history of philosophy that prioritizes philosophical reasons over other cultural factors. This approach contrasts with a broadly contextualist endeavour, which invokes cultural factors without clear ground. I argue that the latter path is either too permissive or it leads to aiming at a complete historical account. Neither way is acceptable: the former obliterates the correctness of interpretation; the latter dissolves the history of philosophy in general history and is practically impossible. Instead, the internal history I propose – based primarily on Michael Frede’s and Maurice Mandelbaum’s historiography – prioritizes philosophical reasoning and appeals to external contextual factors in a principled way when it is necessary to supplement philosophical considerations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0046-385X 2585-7061 |
DOI: | 10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.4 |