Re-conceptualizing centrality in social networks

In the social sciences, networks are used to represent relationships between social actors, be they individuals or aggregates. The structural importance of these actors is assessed in terms of centrality indices which are commonly defined as graph invariants. Many such indices have been proposed, bu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of applied mathematics Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 971 - 985
Main Authors SCHOCH, D., BRANDES, U.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.12.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0956-7925
1469-4425
DOI10.1017/S0956792516000401

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the social sciences, networks are used to represent relationships between social actors, be they individuals or aggregates. The structural importance of these actors is assessed in terms of centrality indices which are commonly defined as graph invariants. Many such indices have been proposed, but there is no unifying theory of centrality. Previous attempts at axiomatic characterization have been focused on particular indices, and the conceptual frameworks that have been proposed alternatively do not lend themselves to mathematical treatment. We show that standard centrality indices, although seemingly distinct, can in fact be expressed in a common framework based on path algebras. Since, as a consequence, all of these indices preserve the neighbourhood-inclusion pre-order, the latter provides a conceptually clear criterion for the definition of centrality indices.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0956-7925
1469-4425
DOI:10.1017/S0956792516000401