A robust ordered weighted averaging loss model for portfolio optimization

In this paper we will propose a Robust Ordered Weighted Averaging (ROWA) optimization model to find a portfolio according to different attitudes towards risk of a decision maker. The rationale of our model is supported by the idea of measuring risk through conditional means of losses from a database...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputers & operations research Vol. 167; p. 106666
Main Authors Benati, Stefano, Conde, Eduardo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper we will propose a Robust Ordered Weighted Averaging (ROWA) optimization model to find a portfolio according to different attitudes towards risk of a decision maker. The rationale of our model is supported by the idea of measuring risk through conditional means of losses from a database of past returns. The way in which these means of extreme losses affect to the final decision may be different according to the risk perception of the decision maker (scenarios). In this context, a compromise portfolio is identified to reconcile the admisible risk attitudes of a decision maker according to different paradigms. We will also link the robustness of the proposed solution with its efficiency from a multi-criterion decision making viewpoint (Pareto optimality). Both concepts have been connected previously in the literature in different contexts. The paper ends with an extensive numerical experiment in order to check the applicability of our model to real data on six financial markets. •Portfolio optimization under different decision maker risk attitudes.•Risk measures through conditional means of losses (discrete CVaR) from a database of past returns.•Minmax regret portfolio to conciliate the admissible decision maker attitudes towards risk.•Linking robustness and efficiency concepts.•Numerical experiment to check the applicability with real data.
ISSN:0305-0548
1873-765X
DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2024.106666