Hybrid governance and extraterritoriality: Understanding Singapore's state capitalism in the context of oil global production networks

• Published in: Environment and planning. A Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 716 - 741
• Main Authors: McGregor, Neil, Coe, Neil M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2023
• Subjects: state capitalism; extraterritoriality; hybrid governance; Singapore; oil global production networks
• ISSN: 0308-518X; 1472-3409
• DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211048197

This paper explores the intersections and overlaps between state capitalism and global production networks. A key feature of the so-called new state capitalism is the combination of state ownership and corporatisation, which creates a system that can be characterised as a hybrid of public–private governance in both corporate and network terms. Moreover, the internationalisation of state hybrids adds an extraterritorial dimension to the state, which can influence the configuration and governance of global production networks. This paper develops a conceptual framework (H–E–N) that foregrounds the relationships between hybrid governance (H), extraterritoriality (E) and global production network configurations (N), thereby promoting an integrated analysis of the implications of the new state capitalism for global production networks. This framework is mobilised to explain how state capitalism in Singapore has influenced the development of the city-state's position in upstream, midstream and downstream oil global production networks over the 1959–2019 period. The study demonstrates that hybrid governance, as part of a wider strategy of state capitalism, has been critical in the development of Singapore's position in oil global production networks. The hybrid nature of the institutional forms associated with state ownership – for instance state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds – goes beyond market facilitation to encompass active state participation in markets. Hybrid governance not only allows the state to influence domestic outcomes but – through the extraterritorial strategies of hybrid entities – can also influence global production network configurations beyond its borders.