Limit models in strictly stable abstract elementary classes

In this paper, we examine the locality condition for non‐splitting and determine the level of uniqueness of limit models that can be recovered in some stable, but not superstable, elementary classes. In particular we prove the following. Suppose that K$\mathcal {K}$ is an elementary class satisfying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMathematical logic quarterly Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 438 - 453
Main Authors Boney, Will, VanDieren, Monica M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, we examine the locality condition for non‐splitting and determine the level of uniqueness of limit models that can be recovered in some stable, but not superstable, elementary classes. In particular we prove the following. Suppose that K$\mathcal {K}$ is an elementary class satisfying (1)the joint embedding and amalgamation properties with no maximal model of cardinality μ$\mu$, (2)stability in μ$\mu$, (3)κμ∗(K)<μ+$\kappa ^*_\mu (\mathcal {K})<\mu ^+$, (4)continuity for non-μ-splitting${\rm non}\text{-}\mu\text{-}{\rm splitting}$ (i.e., if p∈ga-S(M)$p\in \operatorname{ga-S}(M)$ and M$M$ is a limit model witnessed by ⟨Mi|i<α⟩$\langle M_i| i<\alpha \rangle$ for some limit ordinal α<μ+$\alpha <\mu ^+$ and there exists N≺M0$N \prec M_0$ so that p↾Mi$p\mathord {\upharpoonright }M_i$ does not μ$\mu$‐split over N$N$ for all i<α$i<\alpha$, then p$p$ does not μ$\mu$‐split over N$N$). Then for ϑ$\vartheta$ and δ$\delta$ limit ordinals <μ+$<\mu ^+$ both with cofinality ≥κμ∗(K)$\ge \kappa ^*_\mu (\mathcal {K})$, if K$\mathcal {K}$ satisfies symmetry for non-μ-splitting${\rm non}\text{-}\mu\text{-}{\rm splitting}$ (or just (μ,δ)$(\mu,\delta)$‐symmetry), then, for any M1$M_1$ and M2$M_2$ that are (μ,ϑ)$(\mu,\vartheta)$ and (μ,δ)$(\mu,\delta)$‐limit models over M0$M_0$, respectively, we have that M1$M_1$ and M2$M_2$ are isomorphic over M0$M_0$. Note that no tameness is assumed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0942-5616
1521-3870
DOI:10.1002/malq.202200075