Experimental and analytical study on tension lap splices in nonconventional concrete using different techniques

An experimental and analytical study on 15 specimens of lap splices embedded in nonconventional concrete without confining reinforcement was performed under direct tension. The experimental program involved two groups of straight‐ended and anchored‐ended bars; three different techniques were employe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStructural concrete : journal of the FIB Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 911 - 925
Main Authors Fawzy, Tarek, Khalil, Abdel‐Hakim, Atta, Ahmed, Afefy, Hamdy M., Ellithy, Mohamed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 01.04.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An experimental and analytical study on 15 specimens of lap splices embedded in nonconventional concrete without confining reinforcement was performed under direct tension. The experimental program involved two groups of straight‐ended and anchored‐ended bars; three different techniques were employed with different splice lengths. For straight‐ended bars, conventional lap splice was studied as a benchmark. The anchored‐ended steel bars were hooks, hooks intersecting with cross bars, and plate‐end bars. It was found that, the used techniques not only achieved higher tensile stress at failure, but also different modes of failure were observed. Besides, a splice length of five times bar diameter was found to be sufficient to achieve the nominal yield stress of the reinforcing steel bar in the case of anchored‐ended bars. Finally, an analytical model was proposed in order to predict the ultimate tensile stress of the straight‐ended spliced bars. The accuracy of the proposed model was verified against the test results of 137 existing specimens from previous research. The comparison showed good agreement between the results of the proposed model and the test results.
ISSN:1464-4177
1751-7648
DOI:10.1002/suco.202000403