Leukocyte immunoglobulin‐like receptor B1 and B4 (LILRB1 and LILRB4): Highly sensitive and specific markers of acute myeloid leukemia with monocytic differentiation

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monocytic differentiation (M‐AML) remains a diagnostic challenge largely due to lack of sensitive and specific markers for immature monocytes. The immunoglobulin‐like inhibitory receptors, LILRB1 and LILRB4, are expressed on monocytes but have not yet bee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Vol. 100; no. 4; pp. 476 - 487
Main Authors Churchill, Hywyn R. O., Fuda, Franklin S., Xu, Jing, Deng, Mi, Zhang, Cheng Cheng, An, Zhiqiang, Zhang, Ningyan, Chen, Pu, Bergstrom, Colin, Kansagra, Ankit, Collins, Robert, John, Samuel, Koduru, Prasad, Chen, Weina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monocytic differentiation (M‐AML) remains a diagnostic challenge largely due to lack of sensitive and specific markers for immature monocytes. The immunoglobulin‐like inhibitory receptors, LILRB1 and LILRB4, are expressed on monocytes but have not yet been systematically evaluated in the clinical setting. Methods We evaluated the diagnostic performance of LILRB1 and LILRB4 as monocytic markers for both immature and mature monocytes in comparison to other myelomonocytic markers including CD14, CD15, CD33, CD36, and CD64 in eight cases of control bone marrow (BM, 5) and peripheral blood (PB, 3), 64 cases of (M‐AML), and 57 cases of AML without monocytic differentiation (NM‐AML) by flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Results In control BM, LILRB1 and LILRB4 were consistently expressed on monocytes at all stages of maturation, from CD34+/CD14− monocytic precursors to CD14−/dim+ maturing and CD14+ mature monocytes. In M‐AML, LILRB1 and LILRB4 were consistently expressed on monocytes, regardless of the degree of maturity, from CD14−/dim+ monoblasts/promonocytes to CD14+ mature monocytes but were not expressed on myeloblasts. The diagnostic performances as a monocytic marker assessed by sensitivity/specificity were 100%/100% for LILRB1/LILRB4, 100%/82% for CD11b, 80%/100% for CD14, 100%/81% for CD64, 100%/58% for CD15/CD33, and 89%/97% for CD36/CD64. Conclusion The co‐expression of LILRB1/LILRB4 outperformed other myelomonocytic markers as a highly sensitive and specific marker for monocytes at all stages of maturation and could reliably distinguish M‐AML from NM‐AML. LILRB4 additionally represents a novel therapeutic target for treating M‐AML.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-4949
1552-4957
DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.21952