Fine-needle aspiration cytology of metastatic neoplasms in the breast

• Published in: American journal of clinical pathology Vol. 92; no. 1; pp. 27 - 35
• Main Authors: NOUR SNEIGE, ZACHARIAH, S, FANNING, T. V, DEKMEZIAN, R. H, ORDONEZ, N. G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chicago, IL American Society of Clinical Pathologists 01.07.1989
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Biopsy, Needle; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - secondary; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; Male; Mammary gland diseases; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Tumors; Human; Pathology; Mammary gland diseases; Cytologic investigation; Female; Male; Tumor; Metastasis; Malignant tumor; Aspiration punction; Differential diagnostic
• ISSN: 0002-9173; 1943-7722
• DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/92.1.27

Twenty cases of metastatic neoplasms in the breast were identified in a series of 1,034 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) of the breast, of which 389 were malignant. Patients with breast carcinomas in whom metastasis to the contralateral breast developed were excluded from this study. This series consisted of 17 women and 3 men, ranging in age from 28 to 63 years (mean, 49 years). The tumors included oat cell carcinoma (three), melanoma (three), ovarian serous carcinoma (one), bronchogenic adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma (four and two, respectively), lymphoma (two), carcinoid (two), transitional cell carcinoma (one), plasma cell myeloma (one), and rhabdomyosarcoma (one). In two patients, the breast mass was the first manifestation of an extramammary cancer (two adenocarcinoma of the lung). Eleven patients died of disseminated cancer shortly after the breast metastasis was diagnosed. In most cases, the aspirates displayed the cytologic features characteristic of the primary tumors, thereby establishing the metastatic nature of the neoplasm. In four cases (two carcinoids, one myeloma, and one rhabdomyosarcoma), the cytologic features were difficult to differentiate from a primary breast carcinoma; however, the final diagnosis was established by electron microscopic examination and immunocytochemical studies on the aspirates. One case (adenocarcinoma of the lung) was misdiagnosed as primary breast carcinoma on both FNA and mastectomy specimen. Because metastatic neoplasms in the breast may mimic primary breast tumors, the authors recommend the following: (1) Evaluation of FNA of breast should be done with complete knowledge of the patient's clinical history. (2) The possibility of metastasis should be suspected in lesions with unusual cytologic patterns. (3) Ancillary studies on FNA can be helpful in interpreting selected cases.