Student Perceptions of Group Work and Group Formation Strategies

Group work is a common practice in statistics and data science courses. However, students in introductory courses often have a wide range of previous experience with group work. In this study, we examine the perceptions of introductory statistics students around group formation at a medium-sized lib...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of statistics and data science education pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Bussberg, Nicholas W., Taylor, Laura L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 11.07.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Group work is a common practice in statistics and data science courses. However, students in introductory courses often have a wide range of previous experience with group work. In this study, we examine the perceptions of introductory statistics students around group formation at a medium-sized liberal arts university. Group experiences were implemented in two ways. First, students rotated through assigned group seating throughout the semester to work in new teams on in-class work. Second, students completed two group projects. For the first group project, students were randomly assigned a team, and on the second project, students could choose between picking a team of students or being randomized into a team. Pre- and post-semester surveys were used to gather student perceptions around group work formation and to better understand perceived benefits of each method. Students also completed post-project reflections about their project experiences. Surveys and reflections indicated that students preferred working with others that they knew best, but respondents still identified benefits such as getting to know other classmates when working in randomly assigned teams. Responses also indicated the importance of work ethic (e.g., trusting partners, fair distribution of workload) regarding potential teammates for both randomized and self-selected groups.
ISSN:2693-9169
2693-9169
DOI:10.1080/26939169.2025.2507765