Legal opinion on position paper: withholding treatment

We have reviewed carefully the position paper and wish to provide the Association with our opinion with respect to the legal implications involved. This is one paper which clearly supports the "right to life" of newly born retarded or mentally defective infants. In our opinion, this positi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian journal of psychiatry Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 81
Main Authors Swadron, B B, Himel, S G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.02.1979
Subjects
Down Syndrome - psychology
Duodenal Diseases - surgery
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Intestinal Atresia - surgery
Judicial Role
Parental Consent
Patient Advocacy - legislation & jurisprudence
Psychiatry
Societies, Medical
Withholding Treatment
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:We have reviewed carefully the position paper and wish to provide the Association with our opinion with respect to the legal implications involved. This is one paper which clearly supports the "right to life" of newly born retarded or mentally defective infants. In our opinion, this position is entirely within the law. However, the paper does raise a number of significant legal questions which we believe warrant consideration. It is our respectful opinion that a physician, when faced with a situation of parental choice to withhold treatment, should seek the guidance of the Court and only withhold treatment or administer treatment with the back-up of a Court order.
ISSN:0706-7437
DOI:10.1177/070674377902400116