The wonderland of reflections

A fundamental fact for the algebraic theory of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) over a fixed template is that pp-interpretations between at most countable ω -categorical relational structures have two algebraic counterparts for their polymorphism clones: a semantic one via the standard algebr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIsrael journal of mathematics Vol. 223; no. 1; pp. 363 - 398
Main Authors Barto, Libor, Opršal, Jakub, Pinsker, Michael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Jerusalem The Hebrew University Magnes Press 01.02.2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A fundamental fact for the algebraic theory of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) over a fixed template is that pp-interpretations between at most countable ω -categorical relational structures have two algebraic counterparts for their polymorphism clones: a semantic one via the standard algebraic operators H , S , P , and a syntactic one via clone homomorphisms (capturing identities). We provide a similar characterization which incorporates all relational constructions relevant for CSPs, that is, homomorphic equivalence and adding singletons to cores in addition to ppinterpretations. For the semantic part we introduce a new construction, called reflection, and for the syntactic part we find an appropriate weakening of clone homomorphisms, called h1 clone homomorphisms (capturing identities of height 1). As a consequence, the complexity of the CSP of an at most countable ω-categorical structure depends only on the identities of height 1 satisfied in its polymorphism clone as well as the natural uniformity thereon. This allows us in turn to formulate a new elegant dichotomy conjecture for the CSPs of reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures. Finally, we reveal a close connection between h1 clone homomorphisms and the notion of compatibility with projections used in the study of the lattice of interpretability types of varieties.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0021-2172
1565-8511
DOI:10.1007/s11856-017-1621-9