Empirical Likelihood Ratio-Based Goodness-of-Fit Test for the Laplace Distribution

The Laplace distribution can be compared against the normal distribution. The Laplace distribution has an unusual, symmetric shape with a sharp peak and tails that are longer than the tails of a normal distribution. It has recently become quite popular in modeling financial variables (Brownian Lapla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunications in mathematics and statistics Vol. 4; no. 4; pp. 459 - 471
Main Author Alizadeh Noughabi, Hadi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Laplace distribution can be compared against the normal distribution. The Laplace distribution has an unusual, symmetric shape with a sharp peak and tails that are longer than the tails of a normal distribution. It has recently become quite popular in modeling financial variables (Brownian Laplace motion) like stock returns because of the greater tails. The Laplace distribution is very extensively reviewed in the monograph (Kotz et al. in the laplace distribution and generalizations—a revisit with applications to communications, economics, engineering, and finance. Birkhauser, Boston, 2001 ). In this article, we propose a density-based empirical likelihood ratio (DBELR) goodness-of-fit test statistic for the Laplace distribution. The test statistic is constructed based on the approach proposed by Vexler and Gurevich (Comput Stat Data Anal 54:531–545, 2010 ). In order to compute the test statistic, parameters of the Laplace distribution are estimated by the maximum likelihood method. Critical values and power values of the proposed test are obtained by Monte Carlo simulations. Also, power comparisons of the proposed test with some known competing tests are carried out. Finally, two illustrative examples are presented and analyzed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2194-6701
2194-671X
DOI:10.1007/s40304-016-0095-0