Mapping the Age of Official Desistance for Adult Offenders: Implications for Research and Policy

• Published in: Journal of developmental and life-course criminology Vol. 4; no. 4; pp. 516 - 551
• Main Authors: Doherty, Elaine Eggleston, Bersani, Bianca E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.12.2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescents; Age; Arrests; Averages; Criminal justice policy; Criminal sentences; Criminology; Criminology and Criminal Justice; Developmental Psychology; Drug crimes; Imprisonment; Incapacitation; Juvenile offenders; Law and Criminology; Life course; Mapping; Meaning; Medicine/Public Health; Offending; Original Article; Race; Social Policy; Timing; Young adults; United States > US; Desistance; Termination; Longitudinal data; Review; Criminal career
• ISSN: 2199-4641; 2199-465X
• DOI: 10.1007/s40865-018-0095-8

Purpose The age-crime curve is a well-known “fact” in criminology; yet, historically, attention to the interplay between chronological age and offending has focused almost exclusively on the first half of the curve (i.e., onset, rapid escalation, and peak in mid to late adolescence). This study advances understanding of the relationship between offending and age for the second half of the age-crime curve (i.e., during the decline in offending) by studying when desistance happens in young adulthood and beyond. Methods Synthesizing data from 15 US-based longitudinal studies, this research triangulates the timing of official desistance by systematically mapping the age of last criminal justice contact (e.g., arrest, police contact) by age of last follow-up for offenders who continue offending beyond “normative” adolescent offending. Results On average, official desistance occurs within a tightly clustered period early in the life course (i.e., late 20s to early 30s). Even among those followed well into adulthood (age 30 or older), the average age of last criminal justice contact was 35 with later ages of desistance driven by arrests for drug offenses. Observed patterns hold when data are disaggregated by sex, race, type of sample, source of data, and accounting for incarceration. Data censoring (i.e., length of follow-up) strongly impacts estimates of desistance. Conclusions The finding that official desistance largely occurs in early adulthood is inconsistent with US criminal justice policy. We discuss these policy considerations (e.g., sentencing and incapacitation) as well as methodological (e.g., data collection efforts) and theoretical (e.g., identification and meaning of desister or persister) implications.