The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Shadows and Lights on its Construct Validity

Past studies on the factor validity of the Trait subscale of the Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) do unanimously agree on its structure. In fact, researchers are still debating whether the STAI-T is unidimensional or multidimensional. Our aim was to clarify what the STAI-T measur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 475 - 486
Main Authors Balsamo, Michela, Romanelli, Roberta, Innamorati, Marco, Ciccarese, Gabriele, Carlucci, Leonardo, Saggino, Aristide
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.12.2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0882-2689
1573-3505
DOI10.1007/s10862-013-9354-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:Past studies on the factor validity of the Trait subscale of the Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) do unanimously agree on its structure. In fact, researchers are still debating whether the STAI-T is unidimensional or multidimensional. Our aim was to clarify what the STAI-T measures. The STAI-T, the Beck Depression Inventory–II, the Teate Depression Inventory, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory were administered to 1124 psychiatric outpatients and to 877 healthy subjects. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed in order to compare various models in the literature. The internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity of the STAI-T as well as its factorial subscales were assessed. The one-construct two-method (i.e., the STAI-T measures one substantive anxiety construct plus artifacts due to negative–positive item polarity) and the bifactor (i.e., the STAI-T comprises two first-order specific factors [“Anxiety” and “Depression”] and one first-order general factor) models were the best-fitting solutions for the STAI–T in both the clinical and nonclinical samples. The STAI–T total score correlated more strongly with measures of depression than with a concurrent measure of anxiety. The STAI-T should be considered a measure of general negative affect, including specific aspects of cognitive anxiety and depression together.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0882-2689
1573-3505
DOI:10.1007/s10862-013-9354-5