N-Terminal-pro-Brain natriuretic peptide dynamics during effort phenotypes ischemic heart failure and determines prognosis regardless of ejection fraction

•NT-pro-BNP change during effort predicts adverse events in HF.•NT-pro-BNP peak predicts adverse events in HF.•NT-pro-BNP change during effort and peak values reached hold predictive value in HF regardless of EF.•NT-pro-BNP dynamics during effort provides novel prognostic insights in HF of any EF. I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPeptides (New York, N.Y. : 1980) Vol. 129; p. 170315
Main Authors Popovic, Dejana, Djordjevic, Tea, Jakovljevic, Djodje, Ristic, Arsen, Lasica, Ratko, Arena, Ross, Guazzi, Marco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•NT-pro-BNP change during effort predicts adverse events in HF.•NT-pro-BNP peak predicts adverse events in HF.•NT-pro-BNP change during effort and peak values reached hold predictive value in HF regardless of EF.•NT-pro-BNP dynamics during effort provides novel prognostic insights in HF of any EF. Ischemic heart disease leading to heart failure (HF) portends a high overall morbidity and mortality. A higher N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) at rest reflects HF severity and impaired cardiac output, most often secondary to reduced ejection fraction (EF). As an insufficient increase in cardiac output during exertion is common in all HF phenotypes, we examined the value of NT-pro-BNP during exercise testing as a risk stratification index for ischemic HF secondary to either reduced (HFrEF) or mid-ranged/preserved EF (HFmrEF/HFpEF). 213 patients (123 HFrEF; 90 HFmrEF/HFpEF) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). NT-pro-BNP was determined at rest and peak exercise. The distribution of HFrEF and HFmrEF/HFpEF etiology in subjects with and without oxygen consumption trajectory flattening during CPET was similar (p > 0.05). Patients with HFrEF had higher plasma levels of NT-pro-BNP at rest and peak exercise than those with HFmrEF/HFpEF (984 vs. 780; 1012 vs. 845 pg/mL, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas ΔNT-pro-BNPpeak/rest was similar (60 vs. 50 pg/mL, p > 0.05). During the tracking period (22.4 ± 20.3 months) 34 patients died, and there were 2 cardiac transplantations and 3 LVAD implantations. In a multivariate regression model only the NT-pro-BNPpeak and ΔNT-pro-BNPpeak/rest were retained in the regression for the prediction of adverse events (Chi-square:8.97, p = 0.003). ROC analysis demonstrated that NT-pro-BNPpeak ≥1506 pg/mL and ΔNT-pro-BNPpeak/rest ≥108 pg/mL were optimal for identifying patients with a risk (Sn = 76.9, 74.4 %; Sp = 84.7, 80.9 %, respectively). NT-pro-BNP changes during effort and absolute peak values reached provide novel insights emerging as new and strong predictors of adverse events in HF of any EF.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-9781
1873-5169
1873-5169
DOI:10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170315