Iodine solid sorbent design: a literature review of the critical criteria for consideration

Designing sorbents for iodine capture in different conditions requires selection and optimization of a large and diverse range of variables. These variables fall into general categories (or features) of sorbent activity, sorbent stability, and the fate of the loaded material in terms of the disposal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials advances Vol. 5; no. 24; pp. 9515 - 9547
Main Authors Riley, Brian J, Turner, Joshua R, McFarlane, Joanna, Chong, Saehwa, Carlson, Krista, Matyáš, Josef
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Royal Society of Chemistry 09.12.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Designing sorbents for iodine capture in different conditions requires selection and optimization of a large and diverse range of variables. These variables fall into general categories (or features) of sorbent activity, sorbent stability, and the fate of the loaded material in terms of the disposal (waste form) options available. To illustrate, silver-loaded, high-porosity sorbents make for maximized iodine capture and less pressure drop in a column-based sorption system approach, however, this high porosity can lead to less mechanically stable sorbents. Additionally, waste forms containing silver must also be compliant with additional criteria for hazardous waste disposal. Thus, all these aspects must be considered simultaneously when selecting a sorbent for utilization under specific conditions. Information is given for different types of sorbent design considerations for different operating conditions and some emphasis is also given on promising alternatives for silver as the active (chemisorption-based) getter metal. Discussion is given around demonstrated options for waste forms for different metal-iodide compounds. Designing sorbents for iodine capture in different conditions requires selection and optimization of a large and diverse range of variables.
Bibliography:This manuscript has been authored in part by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).
10.1039/d4ma00266k
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI
USDOE
AC05-00OR22725; AC05-76RL01830; NE0009317; 31310022M015
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain
USNRC
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP)
ISSN:2633-5409
2633-5409
DOI:10.1039/d4ma00266k