A Triage Tool to Assess Unmet Health Needs for Children Entering Foster Care

• Published in: Journal of child and family studies Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 475 - 482
• Main Authors: Hodges, Kelly L., Manda, Divya, Nugent, Melodee L., Simpson, Pippa M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.02.2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Behavioral Science and Psychology; Child and School Psychology; Child placement; Coordination; Costs; Foster Care; Foster children; Group Homes; Health care expenditures; Health Needs; Health services utilization; Help seeking behavior; Medicaid; Original Paper; Psychology; Resource allocation; Social Sciences; Sociology; Triage; Youth; Health care coordination; Triage tool; Children; Foster care; Cost and utilization
• ISSN: 1062-1024; 1573-2843
• DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0909-z

Children in foster care have high levels of health care needs, many of which are unmet at foster care entry. Health care coordination (HCC) is essential to ensure unmet needs are addressed rapidly. Data is lacking about how best to triage children at foster care entry so limited HCC resources can be allocated most effectively. Therefore, we aimed to: (1) utilize a Triage Tool (TT) at foster care entry to stratify children based on unmet health care needs and (2) determine if the TT is an accurate predictor of health care utilization as indicated by cost during a child’s first few weeks in care. A TT was developed and utilized during the initial foster care health exam (IFCHE) to stratify children based on unmet needs. Medicaid records were reviewed to determine health care utilization and cost during the first 60 days post-IFCHE. Most children (61.6%) had the lowest level of unmet needs (Level 3), 29.5% had a moderate level of unmet needs (Level 2), and 9.9% had the highest level of unmet needs (Level 1). Medicaid claims review revealed that triage level did not correlate to health care utilization or costs during the first 60 days post-IFCHE. Youth placed in a group home incurred significantly higher costs than those placed in foster homes. These results suggest that the TT is useful clinically but does not predict health care utilization and costs during the first weeks in care. Group home placement incurs more cost than foster home placement, independent of triage level assigned.