Shopping for Old and New Wine A Response

With this rejoinder, we address some of the concerns and questions raised by Ridley and Mollen (2012) and Hill (2012). Specially, we reflect upon Ridley and Mollen’s commentary about whether the three theories in this major contribution can be deemed emergent or whether they are simply old thought i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Counseling psychologist Vol. 40; no. 7; pp. 1078 - 1084
Main Authors Murdock, Nancy L., Nilsson, Johanna E., Duan, Changming
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2012
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:With this rejoinder, we address some of the concerns and questions raised by Ridley and Mollen (2012) and Hill (2012). Specially, we reflect upon Ridley and Mollen’s commentary about whether the three theories in this major contribution can be deemed emergent or whether they are simply old thought in new packages. We also address Hill’s question regarding the theories chosen and her concerns about why so few counseling psychologists are involved in creating theories. Finally, in response to these thoughtful commentaries, we also briefly discuss our views on theory building and scientific development in the field of counseling psychology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0011-0000
1552-3861
DOI:10.1177/0011000012453624