Immediate extubation after pediatric liver transplantation: Update on a single‐center experience

• Published in: Pediatric transplantation Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. e14669 - n/a
• Main Authors: Scalise, P. Nina, Koo, Donna C., Staffa, Steven J., Cuenca, Alex G., Kovatsis, Pete G., Kim, Heung Bae, Lee, Eliza J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Denmark Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2024
• Subjects: Airway Extubation; Child; delayed extubation; Extubation; Humans; immediate extubation; Ischemia; Length of Stay; liver transplant; Liver Transplantation; Liver transplants; Lung transplantation; outcomes; Patients; pediatric; Pediatrics; Postoperative Period; Resource utilization; Retrospective Studies; Risk factors; Time Factors; delayed extubation; immediate extubation; outcomes; liver transplant; pediatric
• ISSN: 1397-3142; 1399-3046
• DOI: 10.1111/petr.14669

Purpose Immediate extubation (IE) following liver transplantation (LT) is increasingly common in adult patients. This study reviews our center's experience with IE in children following LT to determine characteristics predictive of successful IE and its effects on post‐operative outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent LT at our institution between January 2005 and November 2022. Patients with concomitant lung transplants and chronic ventilator requirements were excluded. Results Overall, 235 patients met study criteria. IE was achieved in 164 (69.8%) patients across all diagnoses and graft types. Of IE patients, only two required re‐intubation within 3 days post‐transplant. IE patients exhibited significantly shorter ICU (2 [1, 3 IQR] vs. 4 [2, 4 IQR] days, p < .001) and hospital lengths of stay (17 [12, 24 IQR] vs. 22 [14, 42 IQR] days, p = .001). Pre‐transplant ICU requirement, high PELD/MELD score, intraoperative transfusion, cold ischemia time, and pressor requirements were risk factors against IE. There was no association between IE and recipient age or weight. The proportion of patients undergoing IE post‐transplant increased significantly over time from 2005 to 2022 (p < .001), underscoring the role of clinical experience and transplant team learning curve. Conclusion Spanning 18 years and 235 patients, we report the largest cohort of children undergoing IE following LT. Our findings support that IE is safe across ages and clinical scenarios. As our center gained experience, the rate of IE increased from 40% to 83%. These trends were associated with lower ICU and LOS, the benefits of which include earlier patient mobility and improved resource utilization.