Revisiting exit block after entrance block: Investigation of ablation index‐guided pulmonary vein isolation

• Published in: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 144 - 151
• Main Authors: Nakashima, Takashi, Nagase, Masaru, Shibahara, Taro, Ono, Daiju, Yamada, Takehiro, Tanabe, Gen, Suzuki, Keita, Yamaura, Makoto, Ido, Takahisa, Takahashi, Shigekiyo, Okura, Hiroyuki, Aoyama, Takuma
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Ablation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac arrhythmia; Catheter Ablation - methods; entrance block; exit block; Fibrillation; Heart Atria; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; pulmonary vein; Pulmonary Veins - surgery; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome; pulmonary vein; atrial fibrillation; exit block; ablation; entrance block
• ISSN: 0147-8389; 1540-8159
• DOI: 10.1111/pace.14646

Introduction Unidirectional block, left atrium to pulmonary vein (LA‐PV) entrance block without PV‐LA exit block, has not been fully investigated in the setting of ablation index (AI)‐guided pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI). The aim of this study was to investigate unidirectional blocks during AI‐guided PVI. Methods After achieving entrance block, exit block was evaluated by pacing from the catheter placed in the PV. Local PV musculature capture without conduction to the LA was necessary to prove exit block. Results In total, 441 PVs (including nine left common PVs) from 113 consecutive patients (mean age: 71 ± 12 years, 77 men, 61 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation cases) who underwent initial AI‐guided PVI for atrial fibrillation were studied. Entrance block was achieved in all PVs. of the 247/441 (56%) PVs showing local PV musculature capture, 5/247 (2.0%) showed unidirectional blocks. Three of the five PVs (left superior and inferior PVs in one patient; right superior PV in another patient) showed LA‐PV reconnection, requiring additional ablation to achieve bidirectional block during the procedure. Two of the five PVs (left superior and inferior PVs in one patient) showed LA‐PV reconnection, and thereafter, LA‐PV conduction became blocked again spontaneously, leading to bidirectional block without further ablation during the procedure. Conclusion AI‐guided PVI presented a low prevalence of unidirectional block (2%), using entrance block alone as the endpoint of PVI could therefore be justified.