Intentions to see a psychologist for weight management: A cross‐sectional study investigating beliefs about psychologists, psychological services and obesity

Objectives The current study investigated beliefs about psychologists, psychological services and obesity, and their association with intentions to see a psychologist for weight management. Methods A cross‐sectional online survey design was employed in a sample of 136 adults with overweight or obesi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical psychology Vol. 77; no. 10; pp. 2288 - 2305
Main Authors Murray, Kristen, Brichacek, Emily, Rieger, Elizabeth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Periodicals Inc 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives The current study investigated beliefs about psychologists, psychological services and obesity, and their association with intentions to see a psychologist for weight management. Methods A cross‐sectional online survey design was employed in a sample of 136 adults with overweight or obesity (n = 121 females, M age = 37.58, SD = 9.85). Results Psychologists and psychological services were viewed favourably by participants, with little evidence of role knowledge deficits or significant treatment barriers. Behavioural and social causal beliefs about obesity were indirectly associated with intentions to see a psychologist for weight management through positive associations with psychologists' perceived helpfulness in lifestyle intervention. Indirect effects were not observed for psychological and medical causal beliefs. Conclusion Promotion of psychological services in obesity could highlight their utility in addressing behavioural and social factors. However, there is a need for more research into avoidance of all sources of professional support in this context.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.23163