Considerations and Pitfalls for Reducing Threats to the Validity of Controlled Experiments on Code Comprehension

• Published in: Empirical software engineering : an international journal Vol. 27; no. 6
• Main Author: Feitelson, Dror G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.11.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Compilers; Computer Science; Experimental methods; Experiments; International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC); Interpreters; Programming Languages; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems; Validity; Threats to validity; Code comprehension; Experimental methodology; Controlled experiment
• ISSN: 1382-3256; 1573-7616
• DOI: 10.1007/s10664-022-10160-3

Understanding program code is a complicated endeavor. As a result, studying code comprehension is also hard. The prevailing approach for such studies is to use controlled experiments, where the difference between treatments sheds light on factors which affect comprehension. But it is hard to conduct controlled experiments with human developers, and we also need to find a way to operationalize what “comprehension” actually means. In addition, myriad different factors can influence the outcome, and seemingly small nuances may be detrimental to the study’s validity. In order to promote the development and use of sound experimental methodology, we discuss both considerations which need to be applied and potential problems that might occur, with regard to the experimental subjects, the code they work on, the tasks they are asked to perform, and the metrics for their performance. A common thread is that decisions that were taken in an effort to avoid one threat to validity may pose a larger threat than the one they removed.