Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with left bundle branch block

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly coexisting conditions. The impact of LBBB on catheter ablation of AF has not been well determined. This study aims to explore the long-term outcomes of patients with AF and LBBB after catheter ablation. Forty-two patients with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPacing and clinical electrophysiology Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 518 - 524
Main Authors Tang, Ri‐Bo, Lv, Wen‐He, Long, De‐Yong, Dong, Jian‐Zeng, Du, Xin, Sang, Cai‐Hua, Yu, Rong‐Hui, He, Liu, Jiang, Chen‐Xi, Wen, Song‐Nan, Liu, Nian, Li, Song‐Nan, Wang, Wei, Guo, Xue‐Yuan, Zhao, Xin, Liu, Xiao‐Ying, Wu, Ze‐Yang, Li, Yu‐Kun, Wang, Xue‐Si, Du, Zhuo‐Hang, Ma, Chang‐Sheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly coexisting conditions. The impact of LBBB on catheter ablation of AF has not been well determined. This study aims to explore the long-term outcomes of patients with AF and LBBB after catheter ablation. Forty-two patients with LBBB of 11,752 patients who underwent catheter ablation of AF from 2011 to 2020 were enrolled as LBBB group. After propensity score matching in a 1:4 ratio, 168 AF patients without LBBB were enrolled as non-LBBB group. Late recurrence and a composite endpoint of stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular hospitalization were compared between the two groups. Late recurrence rate was significantly higher in the LBBB group than that in the non-LBBB group (54.8% vs. 31.5%, p = .034). Multivariate analysis showed that LBBB was an independent risk factor for late recurrence after catheter ablation of AF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.40, p = .031). LBBB group was also associated with a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint (21.4% vs. 6.5%, HR 3.98, 95% CI 1.64-9.64, p = .002). LBBB was associated with a higher risk for late recurrence and a higher incidence of composite endpoint in the patients underwent catheter ablation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/pace.14954