Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study

• Published in: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 131; no. 5; pp. 904.e1 - 904.e10
• Main Authors: He, Jianfeng, Liu, Yudong, Lin, Zhiyan, Li, Yongqi, Li, Chengwei, Zhou, Libin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods; Dental Implants; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging; Jaw, Edentulous - surgery; Male; Mandible - diagnostic imaging; Mandible - surgery; Middle Aged; Molar - diagnostic imaging; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 0022-3913; 1097-6841
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.002

Implant placement in the mandibular molar sites plays a crucial role in the restoration of edentulous mandibles. However, the evaluation of bone quantity before implant surgery using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is lacking. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate CBCT images of edentulous patients to analyze the feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites. The CBCT data of 138 patients were analyzed in the sagittal plane for measurements of mandibular bone height (MBH), superior bone height (SBH), inferior bone height (IBH), buccal bone width (BBW), lingual bone width (LBW), and alveolar bone widths (ABWs). The edentulous sites were categorized according to the bone quantity and complexity of the implant surgery. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze the site, sex, and age-related variations. An independent t test was used to compare the difference of bone dimension in different sites and between sexes. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests were used to analyze the difference between different age groups. Categorical variables were presented as number of events and percentages. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables (α=.05). A total of 534 sites of interest were recorded, including 274 hemimandibles. A significant difference in BBW was found between the first and second molar sites. Men had higher MBH, SBH, IBH, and BBW than women. The distribution of implant surgical complexity in the conventional group was 63.5%, while the buccolingual tilted implant group accounted for 17.0%, and the complicated group accounted for 19.5%. Of the 274 hemimandibles, an implant could be placed directly at molar sites in 88% of situations. The BBW at the mandibular second molar site was greater than that at the first molar site. The amount of available bone in the SBH and BBW was greater in men than in women at the healed molar sites. Age did not significantly affect the complexity of the implant surgery. Implants can be placed directly in healed mandibular molar sites in most patients who require a complete arch mandibular implant-supported restoration.