Hydrocarbon evaporative loss evaluation of lacustrine shale oil based on mass balance method: Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer Depression, Junggar Basin

• Published in: Marine and petroleum geology Vol. 91; pp. 422 - 431
• Main Authors: Chen, Junqing, Pang, Xiongqi, Pang, Hong, Chen, Zhuoheng, Jiang, Chunqing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2018
• Subjects: Hydrocarbon evaporative loss evaluation; Junggar Basin; Lacustrine shale; Mass balance method; Permian Lucaogou Formation; Junggar Basin; Lacustrine shale; Hydrocarbon evaporative loss evaluation; Mass balance method; Permian Lucaogou Formation
• ISSN: 0264-8172; 1873-4073
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.01.021

Hydrocarbon evaporative loss evaluation is important for shale oil resource assessment. We propose a mass balance model to evaluate the hydrocarbon evaporative loss (S1-loss) in this study. The proposed method is applied to a large Rock-Eval pyrolysis dataset on source rock samples from the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Depression of the Junggar Basin, NW China, as a case study to evaluate the S1-loss. The results indicate that the S1-loss can range from 0.12 to 7.25 mg/g Rock, corresponding to 11%–89% loss of the generated hydrocarbons (S1-loss/(S1+S1-loss)) due to evaporation before lab analysis. It appears that when Ro ≤ 1.3%, S1-loss and S1-loss/TOC decreases gradually with increasing Ro, likely corresponding to increasing oil density as results of heterogeneous source rock compositions and increased accommodation space via the creation of organic pores of large specific surface for heavy and large hydrocarbon molecules in oil window. When Ro > 1.3%, S1-loss/TOC begins to increase with increasing Ro as more oil crack to gaseous and light hydrocarbons that are more susceptible to evaporative loss. In the case of similar Ro, the relative S1-loss/TOC varies little among the samples but the absolute S1-loss amount increases with increasing TOC. Restricted by regional geological conditions in this study, we focused on the S1-loss for lacustrine type I kerogen only, and quantification of evaporative loss for other kerogen types remains a subject for further study. •Built a model to evaluate the hydrocarbon evaporative loss.•Evaluated the hydrocarbon evaporative loss in the Lucaogou lacustrine shale oil.•Analyzed the impacts on hydrocarbon evaporative loss.