Souter arthroplasty for elbows with severe destruction

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research no. 421; p. 126
• Main Authors: Ikävalko, Mikko, Belt, Eero A, Kautiainen, Hannu, Lehto, Matti U K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.04.2004
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects; Bone Transplantation; Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging; Elbow Joint - surgery; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Humerus - diagnostic imaging; Humerus - surgery; Joint Diseases - classification; Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging; Joint Diseases - surgery; Joint Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Radiography; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ulna - diagnostic imaging; Ulna - surgery
• ISSN: 0009-921X
• DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000126339.83964.55

One hundred fifty-eight primary Souter elbow arthroplasties were done on 134 patients (121 women) with severe joint destruction (Larsen Grade 5) or large bone defects or both. Joint replacement operations were done at our institution from 1985-1997. The study group comprised 156 joints in 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or other variants of chronic inflammatory joint disease, one in a patient with osteoarthritis, and one patient with posttraumatic arthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 57 years (range, 26-81 years) and the mean disease duration was 27 years (tinge, 2-70 years). Radiographically, severe bone defects were detected in 100 humeri and 134 ulnas. Retentive (snap-fit) ulnar components were implanted in 110 joints, and bone grafts were used on 26 humeri and 14 ulnas. Major complications led to five early and 16 late reoperations in 19 patients. Four reoperations were done because of dislocation and eight because of aseptic loosening. One reoperation was done because of early infection and five were done because of late infection. One patient had reoperation because of superficial infection in the bursa olecrani and one triceps tendon rupture also was repaired. One patient had wound repair because of marginal necrosis. In the survival analysis, the cumulative success rate without revision for aseptic loosening at 5 years followup was 97%. Despite the demanding nature of these arthroplasties, the primary results are encouraging. Technically, it is possible to do elbow replacement, even on elbows where the humeral condyles or olecranon or both are missing, if there is sufficient bone left on the diaphyseal areas for primary stem fixation. However, in these extreme cases, the poor general condition of the patient or the difficult soft tissue problems in the elbow region may prove to be a contraindication for joint replacement.