High precision orientation mapping from 4D-STEM precession electron diffraction data through quantitative analysis of diffracted intensities

•New bidimensional electron detectors allow the recording of electron diffraction data with very high speeds and high dynamical range. However, most of the diffraction analysis methods do not yet exploit diffraction intensities.•We propose a methodology to perform automated crystal orientation mappi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltramicroscopy Vol. 259; p. 113927
Main Authors Corrêa, Leonardo M., Ortega, Eduardo, Ponce, Arturo, Cotta, Mônica A., Ugarte, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•New bidimensional electron detectors allow the recording of electron diffraction data with very high speeds and high dynamical range. However, most of the diffraction analysis methods do not yet exploit diffraction intensities.•We propose a methodology to perform automated crystal orientation mapping analysis with diffraction intensities from quasi-kinematical precession electron diffraction (PED) data.•PED intensity analysis provided an angular resolution of ∼ 0.03°, much lower than common template-matching method (∼ 1°).•Intensity-based orientation analysis has been used to reveal the deformation field from a screw dislocation at the center of Eshelby twisted nanowires. The association of scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and detection of a diffraction pattern at each probe position (so-called 4D-STEM) represents one of the most promising approaches to analyze structural properties of materials with nanometric resolution and low irradiation levels. This is widely used for texture analysis of materials using automated crystal orientation mapping (ACOM). Herein, we perform orientation mapping in InP nanowires exploiting precession electron diffraction (PED) patterns acquired by an axial CMOS camera. Crystal orientation is determined at each probe position by the quantitative analysis of diffracted intensities minimizing a residue comparing experiments and simulations in analogy to x-ray structural refinement. Our simulations are based on the two-beam dynamical diffraction approximation and yield a high angular precision (∼0.03°), much lower than the traditional ACOM based on pattern matching algorithms (∼1°). We anticipate that simultaneous exploration of both spot positions and high precision crystal misorientation will allow the exploration of the whole potentiality provided by PED-based 4D-STEM for the characterization of deformation fields in nanomaterials.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0304-3991
1879-2723
DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.113927