Student's metamemory knowledge about the impact of stereoscopic three‐dimensional presentations of science content

Summary We investigated students' knowledge and beliefs about the impact of using three‐dimensional (3D) multimedia presentations. Students listened to a lecture about the ventricular system, which was presented alone (Experiment 1 only) or with a 3D or a 2D video illustrating the system. After...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied cognitive psychology Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 225 - 233
Main Authors Dunlosky, John, Dudley, Daniel, Spitznagel, Mary Beth, Clements, Robert J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis Wiley 01.03.2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary We investigated students' knowledge and beliefs about the impact of using three‐dimensional (3D) multimedia presentations. Students listened to a lecture about the ventricular system, which was presented alone (Experiment 1 only) or with a 3D or a 2D video illustrating the system. Afterwards, students judged how well they would perform on a criterion test. In Experiment 1, students judged that the 3D presentation would be superior to listening to the lecture alone (d = 0.81). Mean judgments were higher for the 3D than 2D presentation (d = 0.24), but this difference was not significant, so we estimated the effect size again. In Experiment 2, judgments were significantly higher after the 3D than 2D presentations (d = 0.40). Test performance was not significantly greater after the 3D than 2D presentations. A survey study again revealed that students believe 3D presentations are superior, and most students reported preferring them to 2D presentations.
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/acp.3469