Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change?

ABSTRACT The question of standardizing the measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been discussed for many years, but the unavailability of automated methods insensitive to the structural heterogeneity of Lp(a) and the transition to a new unit of measurement have delayed this process. The aim of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical apheresis Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. e70018 - n/a
Main Authors Corciulo, Carmen, Pino, Beatrice Dal, Sbrana, Francesco, Bigazzi, Federico
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2025
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT The question of standardizing the measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been discussed for many years, but the unavailability of automated methods insensitive to the structural heterogeneity of Lp(a) and the transition to a new unit of measurement have delayed this process. The aim of this study is to compare, in subjects undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment (31 subjects, mean age 62 ± 11 years, female 7/31), Lp(a) measurements performed using routine polyclonal antibodies with a method that recognizes a single copy of apo(a) per molecule. This pilot study for adopting an assay insensitive to apo(a) size polymorphism showed a good match with the traditional method: correlations between pre‐LA and post‐LA measures show an R2 of 0.89 and 0.76, respectively. Despite the interpretative problem caused by adopting different units of measurement, we believe that moving to an assay insensitive to the dimensional variation of apo(a) represents a necessary change to standardize, improve, and extend the accuracy and diagnostic power of Lp(a).
Bibliography:The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Funding
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0733-2459
1098-1101
1098-1101
DOI:10.1002/jca.70018