Rapid response: A quality improvement conundrum

Many in‐hospital cardiac arrests and other adverse events are heralded by warning signs that are evident in the preceding 6 to 8 hours. By promptly intervening before further deterioration occurs, rapid response teams (RRTs) are designed to decrease unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hospital medicine Vol. 4; no. 4; pp. 255 - 257
Main Authors Prado, Renata, Albert, Richard K., Mehler, Philip S., Chu, Eugene S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many in‐hospital cardiac arrests and other adverse events are heralded by warning signs that are evident in the preceding 6 to 8 hours. By promptly intervening before further deterioration occurs, rapid response teams (RRTs) are designed to decrease unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, cardiac arrests, and inpatient mortality. While implementing RRTs is 1 of the 6 initiatives recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, data supporting their effectiveness is equivocal. Before implementing an RRT in our institution, we reviewed cases of failure to rescue and found that (1) poor outcomes were often associated with attempts to manage early decompensations without a bedside evaluation, and (2) the common causes of decompensation for floor patients (early sepsis, aspiration, pulmonary embolism) were within the scope of our primary teams' practice. Therefore, we felt that prompt, mandatory bedside evaluations by the primary team would decrease untoward outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2009;4:255–257. © 2009 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Bibliography:Telephone: 303‐436‐6900; Fax: 303‐436‐7249
ISSN:1553-5592
1553-5606
DOI:10.1002/jhm.430