Correlations among Predawn Leaf, Midday Leaf, and Midday Stem Water Potential and their Correlations with other Measures of Soil and Plant Water Status in Vitis vinifera

A study was conducted to compare three measurements of determining water status of grapevines ( Vitis vinifera L.) in the field. Predawn leaf water potential (Ψ PD ), midday leaf water potential (Ψ l ), and midday stem water potential (Ψ stem ) were measured on `Chardonnay' and `Cabernet Sauvig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science Vol. 127; no. 3; pp. 448 - 454
Main Authors Williams, L.E, Araujo, F.J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.05.2002
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A study was conducted to compare three measurements of determining water status of grapevines ( Vitis vinifera L.) in the field. Predawn leaf water potential (Ψ PD ), midday leaf water potential (Ψ l ), and midday stem water potential (Ψ stem ) were measured on `Chardonnay' and `Cabernet Sauvignon' grapevines grown in Napa Valley, California late in the 1999 growing season. Both cultivars had been irrigated weekly at various fractions (0, 0.5, and 1.0 for `Chardonnay' and 0, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.5 for `Cabernet') of estimated vineyard evapotranspiration (ET c ) from approximately anthesis up to the dates of measurements. Predawn water potential measurements were taken beginning at 0330 hr and completed before sunrise. Midday Ψ l and Ψ stem measurements were taken only between 1230 and 1330 hr . In addition, net CO 2 assimilation rates (A) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (g s ) were also measured at midday. Soil water content (SWC) was measured in the `Chardonnay' vineyard using a neutron probe. Values obtained for Ψ PD , Ψ l , and Ψ stem in this study ranged from about -0.05 to -0.8, -0.7 to -1.8, and -0.5 to -1.6 MPa, respectively. All three measurements of vine water status were highly correlated with one another. Linear regression analysis of Ψ l and Ψ stem versus Ψ PD resulted in r 2 values of 0.88 and 0.85, respectively. A similar analysis of Ψ l as a function of Ψ stem resulted in an r 2 of 0.92. In the `Chardonnay' vineyard, all three methods of estimating vine water status were significantly ( P < 0.01) correlated with SWC and applied amounts of water. Lastly, Ψ PD , Ψ l , and Ψ stem were all linearly correlated with measurements of A and g s at midday. Under the conditions of this study, Ψ PD, Ψ l , and Ψ stem represent equally viable methods of assessing the water status of these grapevines. They were all correlated similarly with the amount of water in the soil profile and leaf gas exchange as well as with one another.
ISSN:0003-1062
2327-9788
DOI:10.21273/JASHS.127.3.448