On the formation of super-Jupiters: core accretion or gravitational instability?

The Core Accretion model is widely accepted as the primary mechanism for forming planets up to a few Jupiter masses. However, the formation of super-massive planets remains a subject of debate, as their formation via the Core Accretion model requires super-solar metallicities. Assuming stellar atmos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAstrophysics and space science Vol. 369; no. 12; p. 122
Main Authors Nguyen, Max, Adibekyan, Vardan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.12.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Core Accretion model is widely accepted as the primary mechanism for forming planets up to a few Jupiter masses. However, the formation of super-massive planets remains a subject of debate, as their formation via the Core Accretion model requires super-solar metallicities. Assuming stellar atmospheric abundances reflect the composition of protoplanetary disks, and that disk mass scales linearly with stellar mass, we calculated the total amount of metals in planet-building materials that could contribute to the formation of massive planets. In this work, we studied a sample of 172 Jupiter-mass planets and 93 planets with masses exceeding 4 M ♃ . Our results consistently demonstrate that planets with masses above 4 M ♃ form in disks with at least as much metal content as those hosting planets with masses between 1 and 4 M ♃ , often with slightly higher metallicity, typically exceeding that of the proto-solar disk. We interpret this as strong evidence that the formation of very massive Jupiters is feasible through Core Accretion and encourage planet formation modelers to test our observational conclusions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0004-640X
1572-946X
DOI:10.1007/s10509-024-04388-2