How spatial-cue reliability affects navigational performance in young and older adults

Navigational abilities decline with age, but the cognitive underpinnings of this cognitive decline remain partially understood. Navigation is guided by landmarks and self-motion cues, that we address when estimating our location. These sources of spatial information are often associated with noise a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 326 - 342
Main Author Merhav, Maayan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Routledge 04.03.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1382-5585
1744-4128
1744-4128
DOI10.1080/13825585.2024.2387362

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Navigational abilities decline with age, but the cognitive underpinnings of this cognitive decline remain partially understood. Navigation is guided by landmarks and self-motion cues, that we address when estimating our location. These sources of spatial information are often associated with noise and uncertainty, thus posing a challenge during navigation. To overcome this challenge, humans and other species rely on navigational cues according to their reliability: reliable cues are highly weighted and therefore strongly influence our spatial behavior, compared to less reliable ones. We hypothesize that older adults do not efficiently weigh spatial cues, and accordingly, the reliability levels of navigational cues may not modulate their spatial behavior, as with younger adults. To test this, younger and older adults performed a virtual navigational task, subject to modified reliability of landmarks and self-motion cues. The findings revealed that while increased reliability of spatial cues improved navigational performance across both age groups, older adults exhibited diminished sensitivity to changes in landmark reliability. The findings demonstrate a cognitive mechanism that could lead to impaired navigation abilities in older adults.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1382-5585
1744-4128
1744-4128
DOI:10.1080/13825585.2024.2387362