REDUCING THE PERILS OF MERGING BOOLEAN AND WEIGHTED RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS

A need for developing an information retrieval technique maintaining the appeal of Boolean retrieval schemes and in addition providing the advantages of a ranked search output has been pointed out in the literature for many years. However, a previous attempt to incorporate into the Boolean retrieval...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of documentation Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 207 - 211
Main Author RADECKI, TADEUSZ
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London MCB UP Ltd 01.03.1982
Aslib, etc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-0418
1758-7379
DOI10.1108/eb026729

Cover

More Information
Summary:A need for developing an information retrieval technique maintaining the appeal of Boolean retrieval schemes and in addition providing the advantages of a ranked search output has been pointed out in the literature for many years. However, a previous attempt to incorporate into the Boolean retrieval schemes a weighting mechanism to produce ranked lists of documents has not been fully successful. Specifically, further research has demonstrated that the theory behind the previous approach is characterized by disturbing ambiguities and inconsistencies, with equivalent Boolean search request formulations yielding different rankings of documents retrieved. As a result of this more recent research an alternative approach has been outlined. However, a closer analysis of this second approach reveals that it is also not free from some intrinsic weaknesses. The present paper provides the results of this new analysis and suggests a more rigorous methodology.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/4W2-RHPT7X9X-H
filenameID:2780380304
original-pdf:2780380304.pdf
istex:51FFF2D96D7B8700B49BC95A767A5754B3916BE6
href:eb026729.pdf
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0418
1758-7379
DOI:10.1108/eb026729