On the maximum principle for relaxed control problems of nonlinear stochastic systems

We consider optimal control problems for a system governed by a stochastic differential equation driven by a d-dimensional Brownian motion where both the drift and the diffusion coefficient are controlled. It is well known that without additional convexity conditions the strict control problem does...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in continuous and discrete models Vol. 2024; no. 1; p. 8
Main Authors Mezerdi, Meriem, Mezerdi, Brahim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 20.03.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2731-4235
1687-1839
2731-4235
1687-1847
DOI10.1186/s13662-024-03803-w

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We consider optimal control problems for a system governed by a stochastic differential equation driven by a d-dimensional Brownian motion where both the drift and the diffusion coefficient are controlled. It is well known that without additional convexity conditions the strict control problem does not admit an optimal control. To overcome this difficulty, we consider the relaxed model, in which admissible controls are measure-valued processes and the relaxed state process is governed by a stochastic differential equation driven by a continuous orthogonal martingale measure. This relaxed model admits an optimal control that can be approximated by a sequence of strict controls by the so-called chattering lemma. We establish optimality necessary conditions, in terms of two adjoint processes, extending Peng’s maximum principle to relaxed control problems. We show that relaxing the drift and diffusion martingale parts directly as in deterministic control does not lead to a true relaxed model as the obtained controlled dynamics is not continuous in the control variable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2731-4235
1687-1839
2731-4235
1687-1847
DOI:10.1186/s13662-024-03803-w