Emergency Department Patient Navigator Program Demonstrates Reduction in Emergency Department Return Visits and Increase in Follow-up Appointment Adherence
An estimated 56% of emergency department (ED) visits are avoidable. One motivation for return visits is patients' perception of poor access to timely outpatient care. Efforts to facilitate access may help reduce preventable ED visits. We aimed to analyze whether an ED patient navigator (PN) pro...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 53; pp. 173 - 179 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2022
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | An estimated 56% of emergency department (ED) visits are avoidable. One motivation for return visits is patients' perception of poor access to timely outpatient care. Efforts to facilitate access may help reduce preventable ED visits. We aimed to analyze whether an ED patient navigator (PN) program improved adherence with outpatient appointments and reduced ED return visits.
We performed a retrospective analysis of patients evaluated and discharged from two EDs from October 2016 to December 2019. Using propensity score matching, an intervention case group was matched against two control groups – patients similar to the case group who presented either (1) pre-PN intervention or (2) post-PN intervention and did not receive intervention.
The four outcomes included 72-h return ED visits, 30-day return ED visits, overall ED utilization, as well as the intervention group's adherence rates to PN-scheduled outpatient appointments. From 482,896 charts, propensity matching led to a total of 14,295 patients in each group.
PN intervention decreased both acute and subacute ED return visits. Compared to both pre-PN and post-PN controls, navigated patients had a decrease in 72-h and 30-day return visits from 2% to 1% and 7% to 4% (p < 0.001) respectively. Navigated patients also had outpatient appointment adherence rates of 74–80% compared to the estimated national average of 25–56%. While there was no difference in mean ED utilization between the intervention group and pre-PN control group, mean ED utilization was found to be higher in the intervention group compared to the post-PN control group with 0.62 visits compared to 0.38 mean visits (p < 0.001).
By facilitating access to post-ED care, PNs may reduce avoidable ED utilization and improve outpatient follow-up adherence. While overall ED utilization did not change, this may be due to the overall vulnerability of the navigated group which is the goal PN intervention group. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.01.009 |