Feasibility and Effects of a Neuromuscular Warm-Up Based on the Physical Literacy Model for 8-12-Year-Old-Children

• Published in: Research quarterly for exercise and sport Vol. 95; no. 4; pp. 863 - 872
• Main Authors: Jimenez-Garcia, John A., Gómez-Rodas, Alejandro, DeMont, Richard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Routledge 01.10.2024
• Subjects: Athletic Injuries - prevention & control; Child; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Movement - physiology; Muscle Strength - physiology; Neuromuscular training; Patient Compliance; physical activity; physical education; Physical Exertion - physiology; Pleasure; Warm-Up Exercise - physiology; youth; physical education; youth; Neuromuscular training; physical activity
• ISSN: 0270-1367; 2168-3824; 2168-3824
• DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2024.2343361

Background: Physical literacy and injury prevention strategies use similar movement-related constructs and can be connected to develop comprehensive interventions. We aimed to test the feasibility and effects of a neuromuscular warm-up based on physical literacy and injury prevention strategies for 8-12-year-old children. Methods: We conducted a cluster non-randomized controlled trial. We defined a priori feasibility criteria and studied the effects of the intervention on physical literacy constructs, movement competence, and neuromuscular performance. We used generalized linear mixed models controlling for covariates and clustering with a significance level of 0.001. Results: We recruited 18 groups (n = 363) and randomly allocated nine to intervention (n = 179; female = 63.7%, age = 9.8 ± 1 years) and nine to control (n = 184, female = 53.3%, age = 9.9 ± 0.9 years). We met four of seven feasibility criteria (i.e. recruitment, adherence, enjoyment, perceived exertion). The three feasibility criteria that were not met (i.e. compliance, fidelity, follow-up) were slightly below the predefined threshold (90%). Model-adjusted mean differences for physical literacy constructs, movement competence, vertical jump height, horizontal jump distance, 20-m sprint time, and dynamic balance favored the intervention (p < .001). Conclusion: The feasibility evidence indicates that the intervention should be slightly modified before implementing it in a larger study. The observed mean differences are promising and can be used in planning future interventions.