Faculty development needs: Comparing community-based and hospital-based internal medicine teachers
We compared prior training in 4 areas (general teaching skills, teaching specific content areas, teaching by specific methods and in specific settings, and general professional skills) among community-based teachers based in private practices (N=61) compared with those in community sites operated by...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 375 - 379 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Heidelberg
Springer
01.04.2004
Springer Nature B.V Blackwell Science Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We compared prior training in 4 areas (general teaching skills, teaching specific content areas, teaching by specific methods and in specific settings, and general professional skills) among community-based teachers based in private practices (N=61) compared with those in community sites operated by teaching institutions (N=64) and hospital-based faculty (N=291), all of whom attended one of three national faculty development conferences. The prevalence of prior training was low. Hospital-based faculty reported the most prior training in all 4 categories, teaching hospital affiliated community-based teachers an intermediate amount, and private practice community-based teachers the least (all P<.05). This association remained after multivariable adjustment for age, gender, and amount of time spent in teaching and clinical activities. Preferences for future training reported frequently by the private practice community-based teachers included: time management (48%); teaching evidence-based medicine (46%); evaluation of learners (38%); giving feedback (39%); outpatient precepting (38%); and "teaching in the presence of the patient" (39%).[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30619.x |