Faculty development needs: Comparing community-based and hospital-based internal medicine teachers

We compared prior training in 4 areas (general teaching skills, teaching specific content areas, teaching by specific methods and in specific settings, and general professional skills) among community-based teachers based in private practices (N=61) compared with those in community sites operated by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of general internal medicine : JGIM Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 375 - 379
Main Authors HOUSTON, Thomas K, FERENCHICK, Gary S, CLARK, Jeanne M, BOWEN, Judith L, BRANCH, William T, ALGUIRE, Patrick, ESHAM, Richard H, CLAYTON, Charles P, KERN, David E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Springer 01.04.2004
Springer Nature B.V
Blackwell Science Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compared prior training in 4 areas (general teaching skills, teaching specific content areas, teaching by specific methods and in specific settings, and general professional skills) among community-based teachers based in private practices (N=61) compared with those in community sites operated by teaching institutions (N=64) and hospital-based faculty (N=291), all of whom attended one of three national faculty development conferences. The prevalence of prior training was low. Hospital-based faculty reported the most prior training in all 4 categories, teaching hospital affiliated community-based teachers an intermediate amount, and private practice community-based teachers the least (all P<.05). This association remained after multivariable adjustment for age, gender, and amount of time spent in teaching and clinical activities. Preferences for future training reported frequently by the private practice community-based teachers included: time management (48%); teaching evidence-based medicine (46%); evaluation of learners (38%); giving feedback (39%); outpatient precepting (38%); and "teaching in the presence of the patient" (39%).[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30619.x