Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures

In this network meta-analysis, we determined the optimal surgical method for treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. We searched the EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Medline databases for studies evaluating sliding hip screws (SHS), gamma nail (GN) or proximal femoral nail antirotation (P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOncotarget Vol. 9; no. 35; pp. 24168 - 24177
Main Authors Wang, He-Hui, Shu, Wu-Bin, Lan, Guan-Hua, Zhang, Xiao-Bo, Jiang, Zhi-Qiang, Xu, De-Hong, Bao, Xue-Xun, Li, A-Bing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Impact Journals LLC 08.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this network meta-analysis, we determined the optimal surgical method for treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. We searched the EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Medline databases for studies evaluating sliding hip screws (SHS), gamma nail (GN) or proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) methods, and included nine randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed no differences in the rates of complications between SHS and PFNA relative to GN ( > 0.05). However, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score for PFNA (77.6%) was higher than the SUCRA scores for GN (65%) and SHS (7.5%). This suggests PFNA is the better surgical method than GN or SHS for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1949-2553
1949-2553
DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.24202