Swimming With Sharks: Teaching Residents Value-Based Medicine and Quality Improvement Through Resident-Pitched Projects

To create meaningful quality improvement (QI) curricula for graduate medical education (GME) trainees, institutions strive to improve coordination of QI curricula with hospital improvement infrastructure. We created a curriculum to teach residents about QI and value-based medicine (VBM) and assessed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of graduate medical education Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 320 - 326
Main Authors Durstenfeld, Matthew S, Statman, Scott, Carney, Kerrilynn, Cohan, Brigette, Bosworth, Brian, Hauck, Kevin, Dikman, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 01.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To create meaningful quality improvement (QI) curricula for graduate medical education (GME) trainees, institutions strive to improve coordination of QI curricula with hospital improvement infrastructure. We created a curriculum to teach residents about QI and value-based medicine (VBM) and assessed curricular effectiveness. We designed a 2-week required curriculum for internal medicine residents at a large academic program. After participating in basic skills workshops, trainees developed QI/VBM project ideas with faculty and nonclinical support and pitched them to hospital leaders at the end of the rotation. Pre-post and 1-year follow-up surveys were conducted for residents to self-assess knowledge, attitudes, and skills, participation in QI/VBM projects, and career intentions. We tracked QI/VBM project implementation. In the first 2 years (2017-2018), 92 trainees participated, and 71 of 76 (93%) recommended the curriculum. Surveys (76 of 92, 83%) show improvement in our learning objectives (12%-60% pre to 62%-97% post;  < .001 for all; Cohen's d effect size 0.7-1.2), which are sustained at 1-year follow-up (57%-95%;  < .01). Four of 19 projects have been implemented. At 1 year, 95% of residents had presented a quality/value poster presentation, 44% were involved in QI/VBM beyond required rotations, and 26% plan to pursue careers focused on improving quality, safety, or value. Our project-based curriculum culminating in a project pitch to hospital leadership was acceptable to GME trainees, improved self-assessed skills sustained at 1 year, and resulted in successfully implemented QI/VBM projects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains a sample schedule, sample completed resident idea form, full survey results, participant responses to pre-post surveys, and 1-year follow-up survey.
Contributed equally as co-first authors.
Matthew S. Durstenfeld, MD,* is PGY-6 Cardiology Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco; Scott Statman, MD,* is a Hospitalist, Department of Adult Inpatient Medicine, Maine Medical Partners; Kerrilynn Carney, MD, is PGY-7 Cardiology Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Yale University; at the time of writing, Brigette Cohan, BA, was Senior Project Manager, Decision Support and Value Improvement, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, and is now Engagement Manager, Flatiron Health; Brian Bosworth, MD, is Professor and Chief of Medicine, Tisch Hospital, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health; Kevin Hauck, MD, MPH, is Assistant Professor and Associate Program Director, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health; and Andrew Dikman, MD, is Assistant Professor and Associate Program Director, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health.
ISSN:1949-8349
1949-8357
DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-19-00421.1