Swimming With Sharks: Teaching Residents Value-Based Medicine and Quality Improvement Through Resident-Pitched Projects
To create meaningful quality improvement (QI) curricula for graduate medical education (GME) trainees, institutions strive to improve coordination of QI curricula with hospital improvement infrastructure. We created a curriculum to teach residents about QI and value-based medicine (VBM) and assessed...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of graduate medical education Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 320 - 326 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
01.06.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To create meaningful quality improvement (QI) curricula for graduate medical education (GME) trainees, institutions strive to improve coordination of QI curricula with hospital improvement infrastructure.
We created a curriculum to teach residents about QI and value-based medicine (VBM) and assessed curricular effectiveness.
We designed a 2-week required curriculum for internal medicine residents at a large academic program. After participating in basic skills workshops, trainees developed QI/VBM project ideas with faculty and nonclinical support and pitched them to hospital leaders at the end of the rotation. Pre-post and 1-year follow-up surveys were conducted for residents to self-assess knowledge, attitudes, and skills, participation in QI/VBM projects, and career intentions. We tracked QI/VBM project implementation.
In the first 2 years (2017-2018), 92 trainees participated, and 71 of 76 (93%) recommended the curriculum. Surveys (76 of 92, 83%) show improvement in our learning objectives (12%-60% pre to 62%-97% post;
< .001 for all; Cohen's d effect size 0.7-1.2), which are sustained at 1-year follow-up (57%-95%;
< .01). Four of 19 projects have been implemented. At 1 year, 95% of residents had presented a quality/value poster presentation, 44% were involved in QI/VBM beyond required rotations, and 26% plan to pursue careers focused on improving quality, safety, or value.
Our project-based curriculum culminating in a project pitch to hospital leadership was acceptable to GME trainees, improved self-assessed skills sustained at 1 year, and resulted in successfully implemented QI/VBM projects. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains a sample schedule, sample completed resident idea form, full survey results, participant responses to pre-post surveys, and 1-year follow-up survey. Contributed equally as co-first authors. Matthew S. Durstenfeld, MD,* is PGY-6 Cardiology Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco; Scott Statman, MD,* is a Hospitalist, Department of Adult Inpatient Medicine, Maine Medical Partners; Kerrilynn Carney, MD, is PGY-7 Cardiology Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Yale University; at the time of writing, Brigette Cohan, BA, was Senior Project Manager, Decision Support and Value Improvement, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, and is now Engagement Manager, Flatiron Health; Brian Bosworth, MD, is Professor and Chief of Medicine, Tisch Hospital, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health; Kevin Hauck, MD, MPH, is Assistant Professor and Associate Program Director, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health; and Andrew Dikman, MD, is Assistant Professor and Associate Program Director, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health. |
ISSN: | 1949-8349 1949-8357 |
DOI: | 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00421.1 |