Bifurcation PCI with a hybrid strategy with drug- eluting balloons versus a stepwise provisional two- stent strategy: Rationale and design of the hybrid DEB study

The optimal treatment strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complex and remains a subject of debate. Current guidelines advise a stepwise provisional approach with optional two-stent strategy. However, a two-stent strategy, both upfront and stepwise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American heart journal Vol. 266; pp. 168 - 175
Main Authors Dillen, Daimy M.M., Vlaar, Pieter Jan, Vermeer, Amy J.E., Paradies, Valeria, van Kuijk, Jan- Peter, Vink, Maarten A., Oemrawsingh, Rohit M., Hofma, Sjoerd H., Magro, Michael, Remkes, Wouter S., de Smet, Bart J.G.L., van Rees, Johannes B., Somi, Samer, Halim, Jonathan, Zimmermann, Frederik M., Wijnbergen, Inge F., Tijssen, Jan G.P., Tonino, Pim A.L., Teeuwen, Koen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Elsevier Inc 01.12.2023
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-8703
1097-6744
1097-6744
DOI10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.010

Cover

More Information
Summary:The optimal treatment strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complex and remains a subject of debate. Current guidelines advise a stepwise provisional approach with optional two-stent strategy. However, a two-stent strategy, both upfront and stepwise provisional, is technically demanding. Therefore, there is increasing interest in the use of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) in bifurcation lesions, mainly after a provisional approach with unsatisfactory result of the side branch. Some small pilot studies already showed that the use of DEB in bifurcation lesions is safe and feasible. However, a randomized comparison of this hybrid DEB strategy with a two-stent strategy is currently lacking. The Hybrid DEB study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial investigating noninferiority of a hybrid DEB approach, using a combination of a drug-eluting stent (DES) in the main vessel and DEB in the side branch, compared to stepwise provisional two-stent strategy in patients with true bifurcation lesions. A total of 500 patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesions, treated with a stepwise provisional approach and an unsatisfactory result of the side branch after main vessel stenting (≥ 70% stenosis and/or < thrombolysis in myocardial infarction III flow), will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either treatment with a DEB or with a DES in the side branch. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of the occurrence of all-cause death, periprocedural or spontaneous myocardial infarction and/or target vessel revascularization at the anticipated median 2-year follow-up. The Hybrid DEB study will compare in a multicenter, randomized fashion a hybrid DEB approach with a stepwise provisional two-stent strategy in patients with true bifurcation lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT05731687.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.010