Error Types in Malaysian Lower Secondary School Student Writing: A Corpus-Informed Analysis of Subject-Verb Agreement and Copula be

The issue of English language proficiency among Malaysian students has always been a subject of ongoing discussion among educators. While English is taught as a second language in primary and secondary schools, many students, especially those from rural areas, have problems using the language correc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of language teaching, linguistics, and literature Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 127 - 140
Main Authors Ang, Leng Hong, Tan, Kim Hua, Lye, Guang Yang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Selangor Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 01.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The issue of English language proficiency among Malaysian students has always been a subject of ongoing discussion among educators. While English is taught as a second language in primary and secondary schools, many students, especially those from rural areas, have problems using the language correctly. Also, it has been said that students' English language proficiency in most rural contexts takes on the quality of a foreign language rather than a second language. The current study addresses this problem by examining the use of Subject-Verb Agreement and copula be in essays written by 32 Malay lower secondary school students from a rural school in Kedah state, Malaysia. Using corpus-linguistic approach, this study compiled 128 essays and tagged them with online part-of-speech (POS) UCREL CLAWS tagger. This is a novel attempt in integrating Error Analysis (EA) framework with a corpus tagging approach to examine error patterning in learner writing. Using corpus-based techniques, this study identifies and analyses errors associated with SVA and copula be in Malaysian lower secondary school student writing. The findings showed that student writings were riddled with various types of errors, namely misselection, omission, blends, and overinclusion. Based on these findings, this study offers pedagogical suggestions for improving the teaching and learning of the language.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0128-5157
2550-2247
0128-5157
DOI:10.17576/3L-2020-2604-10