Spray Deposition and Losses to Soil from a Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Airblast Sprayer on Coffee

• Published in: AgriEngineering Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. 2385 - 2394
• Main Authors: Cunha, João Paulo Arantes Rodrigues da, Lopes, Luana de Lima, Alves, Caio Oliveira Rodrigues, Alvarenga, Cleyton Batista de
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2024
• Subjects: Aircraft; application technology; Canopies; coffea arabica; Coffee; Control stability; Crop diseases; Crop dusting; drones; Leaves; Nozzles; Plant protection; Process control; Process controls; Quality standards; Remotely piloted aircraft; Soil analysis; Spectrophotometry; Spray deposition; spray volume; Sprayers; Spraying; Sprays; Statistical process control; Variance analysis; Brazil
• ISSN: 2624-7402; 2624-7402
• DOI: 10.3390/agriengineering6030139

Remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs) have been increasingly used for crop protection in coffee plantations. However, the applications can result in low spray deposition on leaves and higher product losses between rows compared to ground airblast sprayers. This study aimed to evaluate the spray deposition on the coffee canopy and potential losses to the soil during application with an RPA and an airblast sprayer at varying spray volumes. The experiment comprised four spray treatments: RPA at 10 L ha−1 and 20 L ha−1, and airblast sprayer at 200 L ha−1 and 300 L ha−1. Leaf deposition was quantified by measuring a tracer on leaves from the lower and upper parts of the coffee canopy using spectrophotometry. Spray losses to the soil were measured by analyzing tracer residues on Petri dishes positioned within the inter-rows and beneath the coffee canopy. Statistical process control was used to analyze spray deposition quality in the study area. Ground-based airblast spraying resulted in the highest overall canopy deposition, while RPA spraying led to greater losses within the inter-rows. No significant difference was observed in spray runoff beneath the canopy between ground-based and aerial applications. Leaf deposition exhibited random variability across all application methods. Therefore, application stability, control, and spray quality standards were maintained.