Development and evaluation of best practice advisory alert for patient eligibility in a hospital-at-home program: A multicenter retrospective study

• Published in: Journal of hospital medicine Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 165 - 174
• Main Authors: Maniaci, Michael J, Torres-Guzman, Ricardo A, Avila, Francisco R, Maita, Karla, Garcia, John P, Forte, Antonio J, Rutledge, Rachel, Dugani, Sagar B, Campbell, Shannon M, Pritchard, Ingrid J, Paulson, Margaret R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Frontline Medical Communications 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Consensus; Electronic Health Records; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Patients; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1553-5592; 1553-5606
• DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13275

Hospital-at-home (HaH) is a growing model of care that has been shown to improve patient outcomes, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. However, selecting appropriate patients for HaH is challenging, often requiring burdensome manual screening by clinicians. To facilitate HaH enrollment, electronic health record (EHR) tools such as best practice advisories (BPAs) can be used to alert providers of potential HaH candidates. To describe the development and implementation of a BPA for identifying HaH eligible patients in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program, and to evaluate the provider response and the patient characteristics that triggered the BPA. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of hospitalized patients who triggered the BPA notification for ACH eligibility between March and December 2021 at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, FL and Mayo Clinic Health System in Eau Claire, WI. We extracted demographic and diagnosis data from the patients as well as characteristics of the providers who received the BPA notification. The BPA was developed based on the ACH inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were derived from clinical guidelines, literature review, and expert consensus. The BPA was integrated into the EHR and displayed a pop-up message to the provider when a patient met the criteria for ACH eligibility. The provider could choose to refer the patient to ACH, dismiss the notification, or defer the decision. The main outcomes were the number and proportion of BPA notifications that resulted in a referral to ACH, and the number and proportion of referrals that were accepted by the ACH clinical team and transferred to ACH. We also analyzed the factors associated with the provider's decision to refer or not refer the patient to ACH, such as the provider's role, location, and specialty. During the study period, 8962 notifications were triggered for 2847 patients. Providers opted to refer 711 (11.4%) of the total notifications linked to 324 unique patients. After review by the ACH clinical team, 31 of the 324 referrals (9.6%) met clinical and social criteria and were transferred to ACH. In multivariable analysis, Wisconsin nurses, physician assistants, and in-training personnel had lower odds of referring the patients to ACH when compared to attending physicians.