A systematic assessment of the pro-poor reach of development bank investments in urban sanitation

Abstract This paper presents an assessment of development banks’ investment in urban sanitation between 2010 and 2017. It reveals an overall increase in investment, yet this falls short of bridging the significant financing gap in the sector. The paper also assesses the major areas of investment to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of water, sanitation, and hygiene for development Vol. 8; no. 3; pp. 402 - 414
Main Authors Hutchings, P., Johns, M., Jornet, D., Scott, C., Van den Bossche, Z.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London IWA Publishing 01.09.2018
Subjects
21st century
Capacity development
Developing countries
Development banks
Drinking water
Evaluation
Financing
Hygiene
Investment
Investments
LDCs
Poverty
Researchers
Sanitation
Sanitation services
Sewage
Sewerage
Sludge
Sustainable development
France
United States > US
Africa
South Asia
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract This paper presents an assessment of development banks’ investment in urban sanitation between 2010 and 2017. It reveals an overall increase in investment, yet this falls short of bridging the significant financing gap in the sector. The paper also assesses the major areas of investment to show that, on the infrastructure side, 20 times more money is invested in sewerage than faecal sludge management, while on the enabling environment side, institutional capacity building is the most financed area. Using a new pro-poor assessment tool, an appraisal was made of the extent to which the investments were pro-poor. This analysis indicates that over half of investments, where an assessment could be made, were considered to be pro-poor, yet the use of the assessment tool reflects a lack of information within development bank reporting on the pro-poor nature of investments. Going forward, improving how development banks report on the pro-poor character of their investments would be a useful step for helping the sector assess the effectiveness of investments. The paper concludes by arguing that, despite progress, development banks should be even more ambitious in seeking to support pro-poor urban sanitation investments if the world is to overcome the urban sanitation challenge.
ISSN:2043-9083
2408-9362
DOI:10.2166/washdev.2018.147