Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of pressure pain threshold assessment in stroke patients
As pain is a common symptom following a stroke, pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessment can be used to evaluate pain status or pain sensitivity of patients. However, the reliability of PPT test in stroke patients is still unknown. To examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of PPT measurement...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Vol. 58; no. 4; pp. 549 - 557 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Italy
Edizioni Minerva Medica
01.08.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | As pain is a common symptom following a stroke, pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessment can be used to evaluate pain status or pain sensitivity of patients. However, the reliability of PPT test in stroke patients is still unknown.
To examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of PPT measurements in poststroke survivors and explore their factors.
An observational study.
The setting of the study is a rehabilitation hospital.
The population of the study was represented by a total of 54 patients after stroke.
The study included 16 measured points on the affected and unaffected sides. PPT was assessed by two raters in turn. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
All intra-rater (ICC=0.84-0.97) and inter-rater (ICC=0.83-0.95) reliability for PPT assessment were good or excellent in stroke patients. Of the 16 points, 12 showed higher intra-rater ICC values than inter-rater, whereas no evident difference was observed between the affected and unaffected sides. Furthermore, patients who were male, ischemic, or with higher motor function generally performed higher ICC values than those who were female (24 out of 32 results), hemorrhagic (28 out of 32 results), or mobility dysfunction (26 out of 32 results), respectively.
PPT assessment with good or excellent reliability can be used in stroke patients. Neither of the two sides (affected or unaffected) affects PPT reliability, and intra-rater reliability is better than inter-rater reliability. In addition, gender, stroke type, and motor function can affect the reliability of measuring mechanical pain threshold in poststroke survivors.
The pressure algometer can be used as a reliable and portable tool to assess the mechanical pain tolerance and sensory function in stroke patients in clinics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Authors’ contributions.—Yong-Hui Zhang and Yu-Chen Wang equally contributed to the study validation, and to the manuscript draft, revision and editing; Ji-Feng Rong and Xue-Qiang Wang have given substantial contributions to the study conception; Yong-Hui Zhang, Yu-Chen Wang, Gong-Wei Hu, Xiao-Qin Ding, Xiao-Hua Shen and Hui Yang contributed to the study data collection; Gong-Wei Hu, Xiao-Qin Ding, Xiao-Hua Shen and Hui Yang contributed to the data interpretation and analysis; Xue-Qiang Wang contributed to the study supervision. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Acknowledgements.—The authors acknowledge all the clinicians and participants who volunteered to participate in this study, because the study would have not been successful without their contribution. Funding.—The work was funded by the Shanghai Frontiers Science Research Base of Exercise and Metabolic Health, the Shanghai Key Lab of Human Performance (Shanghai University of Sport) (11DZ2261100), the Talent Development Fund of Shanghai Municipal (2021081), the scientific and technological research program of the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (19080503100), the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Scientific Research Project (202040023), and the Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Disabled Persons Federation (K2018011). Conflicts of interest.—The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript. |
ISSN: | 1973-9087 1973-9095 |
DOI: | 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07378-6 |